Australia vs Latvia: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
40th
Latvia rank
39th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 39th of 129 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Australia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Australia and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 39th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.