Ecuador vs Namibia: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Ecuador
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ecuador rank
53rd
Namibia rank
54th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 54th of 129 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 54th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.