Kazakhstan vs Suriname: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Suriname
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
103rd
Suriname rank
102nd
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Suriname ranks 102nd of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Suriname?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Suriname rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Suriname ranks 102nd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.