Latvia vs Nicaragua: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia rank
39th
Nicaragua rank
42nd
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 39th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 129 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 39th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.