Luxembourg vs Singapore: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Singapore
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
78th
Singapore rank
77th
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 78th and Singapore ranks 77th of 129 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Singapore?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Singapore?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Singapore rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 78th and Singapore ranks 77th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.