Madagascar vs Suriname: Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP
Madagascar
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Suriname
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Madagascar rank
101st
Suriname rank
102nd
Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Madagascar
- Suriname
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 101st and Suriname ranks 102nd of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp, Madagascar or Suriname?
- Madagascar, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp between Madagascar and Suriname?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Suriname?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Suriname rank globally for total fibre furnish — production, per unit of gdp?
- Madagascar ranks 101st and Suriname ranks 102nd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total fibre furnish — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total fibre furnish — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.