Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Total fibre furnish — Production

Australia and New Zealand
4.99 million t
in 2024
Chile
5.62 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Chile rank
18th

Total fibre furnish — Production over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Chile
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 5.62 million t against 4.99 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 636,000 t.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Chile ranks 18th of 149 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 841,000 t 232,278 t 608,722 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 1.96 million t 512,190 t 1.44 million t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 2.67 million t 904,060 t 1.76 million t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 3.61 million t 1.98 million t 1.63 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 5.25 million t 3.90 million t 1.35 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 6.56 million t 5.51 million t 1.05 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 5.45 million t 5.15 million t 297,344 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fibre furnish — production, Australia and New Zealand or Chile?
Chile, at 5.62 million t against 4.99 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fibre furnish — production between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
636,000 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Chile rank globally for total fibre furnish — production?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Chile ranks 18th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total fibre furnish — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Total fibre furnish — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fibre-furnish-production/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/">Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Total fibre furnish — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fibre furnish — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
192 places, 8,745 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The database contains data on the production and trade in roundwood and in primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world.The main types of primary forest products included in this database are roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further and defined in the Joint Forest Sector Questionnaire (JFSQ) (https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en). The database contains details of the following topics: - roundwood removals (production) by coniferous and non-coniferous wood and assortments, - production and trade in industrial roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, wood charcoal, pulp, paper and paperboard, and other products. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en