Early-demographic dividend vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
0.0215 metric tons per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.1259 metric tons per person
in 2024
Early-demographic dividend rank
20th
Namibia rank
17th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Namibia
00.20.40.6196019922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.0215 metric tons per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1044 metric tons per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 5.9 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 metric tons per person 0.0028 metric tons per person 0.0103 metric tons per person Early-demographic dividend
1970s 0.0111 metric tons per person 0.0086 metric tons per person 0.0024 metric tons per person Early-demographic dividend
1980s 0.0106 metric tons per person 0.0154 metric tons per person 0.0048 metric tons per person Namibia
1990s 0.0133 metric tons per person 0.3546 metric tons per person 0.3413 metric tons per person Namibia
2000s 0.0149 metric tons per person 0.2926 metric tons per person 0.2777 metric tons per person Namibia
2010s 0.0186 metric tons per person 0.2143 metric tons per person 0.1957 metric tons per person Namibia
2020s 0.0205 metric tons per person 0.1236 metric tons per person 0.1031 metric tons per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.0215 metric tons per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Namibia?
0.1044 metric tons per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Namibia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Namibia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/namibia/">Early-demographic dividend vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.