South Korea vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

South Korea
0.0687 metric tons per person
in 2024
Post-demographic dividend
0.02 metric tons per person
in 2024
South Korea rank
25th
Post-demographic dividend rank
22nd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • South Korea
  • Post-demographic dividend
0.020.040.060.08196019922024

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.0687 metric tons per person against 0.02 metric tons per person in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0487 metric tons per person.

That makes South Korea's figure about 3.4 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.

South Korea ranks 25th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 6 and Post-demographic dividend in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0216 metric tons per person 0.0268 metric tons per person 0.0052 metric tons per person Post-demographic dividend
1970s 0.053 metric tons per person 0.0324 metric tons per person 0.0206 metric tons per person South Korea
1980s 0.0745 metric tons per person 0.0351 metric tons per person 0.0394 metric tons per person South Korea
1990s 0.0717 metric tons per person 0.0311 metric tons per person 0.0406 metric tons per person South Korea
2000s 0.0588 metric tons per person 0.0259 metric tons per person 0.0329 metric tons per person South Korea
2010s 0.0665 metric tons per person 0.0235 metric tons per person 0.043 metric tons per person South Korea
2020s 0.071 metric tons per person 0.0213 metric tons per person 0.0497 metric tons per person South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, South Korea or Post-demographic dividend?
South Korea, at 0.0687 metric tons per person against 0.02 metric tons per person in Post-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between South Korea and Post-demographic dividend?
0.0487 metric tons per person, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Post-demographic dividend?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do South Korea and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
South Korea ranks 25th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/korea-rep/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/korea-rep/post-demographic-dividend/">South Korea vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.