Latin America & Caribbean vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

Latin America & Caribbean
0.0282 metric tons per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.1259 metric tons per person
in 2024
Latin America & Caribbean rank
16th
Namibia rank
17th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Namibia
00.20.40.6196019922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.0282 metric tons per person in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.0977 metric tons per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 4.5 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Latin America & Caribbean averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0393 metric tons per person 0.0028 metric tons per person 0.0365 metric tons per person Latin America & Caribbean
1970s 0.0291 metric tons per person 0.0086 metric tons per person 0.0205 metric tons per person Latin America & Caribbean
1980s 0.0335 metric tons per person 0.0154 metric tons per person 0.018 metric tons per person Latin America & Caribbean
1990s 0.0418 metric tons per person 0.3546 metric tons per person 0.3128 metric tons per person Namibia
2000s 0.0358 metric tons per person 0.2926 metric tons per person 0.2567 metric tons per person Namibia
2010s 0.0259 metric tons per person 0.2143 metric tons per person 0.1883 metric tons per person Namibia
2020s 0.0269 metric tons per person 0.1236 metric tons per person 0.0967 metric tons per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, Latin America & Caribbean or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.0282 metric tons per person in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between Latin America & Caribbean and Namibia?
0.0977 metric tons per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Namibia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Namibia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 16th and Namibia ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/latin-america-and-caribbean/namibia/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Namibia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.