New Zealand vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita

New Zealand
0.08 metric tons per person
in 2024
Post-demographic dividend
0.02 metric tons per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
24th
Post-demographic dividend rank
22nd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • New Zealand
  • Post-demographic dividend
00.050.10.150.2196019922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.08 metric tons per person against 0.02 metric tons per person in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.06 metric tons per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 4.0 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.

New Zealand ranks 24th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Post-demographic dividend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0203 metric tons per person 0.0268 metric tons per person 0.0065 metric tons per person Post-demographic dividend
1970s 0.0251 metric tons per person 0.0324 metric tons per person 0.0073 metric tons per person Post-demographic dividend
1980s 0.0705 metric tons per person 0.0351 metric tons per person 0.0354 metric tons per person New Zealand
1990s 0.1533 metric tons per person 0.0311 metric tons per person 0.1222 metric tons per person New Zealand
2000s 0.1517 metric tons per person 0.0259 metric tons per person 0.1258 metric tons per person New Zealand
2010s 0.117 metric tons per person 0.0235 metric tons per person 0.0935 metric tons per person New Zealand
2020s 0.0878 metric tons per person 0.0213 metric tons per person 0.0665 metric tons per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita, New Zealand or Post-demographic dividend?
New Zealand, at 0.08 metric tons per person against 0.02 metric tons per person in Post-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita between New Zealand and Post-demographic dividend?
0.06 metric tons per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Post-demographic dividend?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
New Zealand ranks 24th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 22nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/new-zealand/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/new-zealand/post-demographic-dividend/">New Zealand vs Post-demographic dividend: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.