Afghanistan vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0209 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
206th
Eswatini rank
209th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.0209 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0157 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 4.0 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 206th and Eswatini ranks 209th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0069 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0062 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0106 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 0.0196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0146 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Eswatini?
Afghanistan, at 0.0209 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Eswatini?
0.0157 metric tons per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eswatini?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Eswatini rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 206th and Eswatini ranks 209th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/eswatini/">Afghanistan vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.