Albania vs Burundi: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Albania
0.7058 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi
0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Albania rank
115th
Burundi rank
112th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Albania
  • Burundi
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7058 metric tons per square kilometre in Albania, a difference of 0.0853 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Albania ranks 115th and Burundi ranks 112th of 216 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Burundi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1541 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3327 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 0.3066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2304 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 0.3967 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0678 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 0.1405 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6581 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5176 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 0.2165 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5253 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3088 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 0.4346 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6774 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2428 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 0.6616 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7882 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1265 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Albania or Burundi?
Burundi, at 0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7058 metric tons per square kilometre in Albania as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Albania and Burundi?
0.0853 metric tons per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Burundi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Albania and Burundi rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Albania ranks 115th and Burundi ranks 112th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Burundi: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/albania/burundi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/albania/burundi/">Albania vs Burundi: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.