Argentina vs Madagascar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Argentina
0.3197 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
0.3052 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
147th
Madagascar rank
149th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Madagascar
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.3197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3052 metric tons per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0145 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Argentina ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Madagascar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0804 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0145 metric tons per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 0.1213 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1054 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0159 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.1575 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1308 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0266 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.3672 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2051 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1621 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.3528 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2549 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0979 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2409 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0632 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.3217 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2523 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0694 metric tons per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Argentina or Madagascar?
Argentina, at 0.3197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3052 metric tons per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Argentina and Madagascar?
0.0145 metric tons per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Madagascar rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 147th and Madagascar ranks 149th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Madagascar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/argentina/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/argentina/madagascar/">Argentina vs Madagascar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.