Australia vs Lesotho: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Australia
0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
195th
Lesotho rank
192nd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Lesotho
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.5 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 195th and Lesotho ranks 192nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0112 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0112 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0168 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0164 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0246 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0239 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0341 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0358 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0026 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0333 metric tons per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0379 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0389 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 0.0449 metric tons per square kilometre 0.068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0231 metric tons per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Australia or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Australia and Lesotho?
0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Lesotho rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 195th and Lesotho ranks 192nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Lesotho: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/australia/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/australia/lesotho/">Australia vs Lesotho: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.