Belize vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Belize
8.68 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
High income
0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
27th
High income rank
26th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Belize
  • High income
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 8.68 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 7.92 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 11.4 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was High income ahead.

Belize ranks 27th and High income ranks 26th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and High income in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize High income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0443 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7077 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6634 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1970s 0.088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9474 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8594 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1980s 0.0996 metric tons per square kilometre 1.2 metric tons per square kilometre 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1990s 0.6738 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2898 metric tons per square kilometre High income
2000s 6.95 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7961 metric tons per square kilometre 6.15 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2010s 7.62 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7571 metric tons per square kilometre 6.87 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2020s 8.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7619 metric tons per square kilometre 7.75 metric tons per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Belize or High income?
Belize, at 8.68 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Belize and High income?
7.92 metric tons per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and High income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and High income rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Belize ranks 27th and High income ranks 26th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/high-income/">Belize vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.