Belize vs IDA total: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Belize
8.68 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total
0.7862 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
27th
IDA total rank
24th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Belize
  • IDA total
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 8.68 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7862 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 7.89 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 11.0 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was IDA total ahead.

Belize ranks 27th and IDA total ranks 24th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and IDA total in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize IDA total Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0443 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0735 metric tons per square kilometre IDA total
1970s 0.088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1846 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0966 metric tons per square kilometre IDA total
1980s 0.0996 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2352 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1355 metric tons per square kilometre IDA total
1990s 0.6738 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3666 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2000s 6.95 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4934 metric tons per square kilometre 6.46 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2010s 7.62 metric tons per square kilometre 0.668 metric tons per square kilometre 6.96 metric tons per square kilometre Belize
2020s 8.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.759 metric tons per square kilometre 7.76 metric tons per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Belize or IDA total?
Belize, at 8.68 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7862 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Belize and IDA total?
7.89 metric tons per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and IDA total?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and IDA total rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Belize ranks 27th and IDA total ranks 24th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs IDA total: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/ida-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belize/ida-total/">Belize vs IDA total: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.