Bhutan vs Botswana: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
212th
Botswana rank
211th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Botswana
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.7 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 212th and Botswana ranks 211th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.0038 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Botswana?
0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Botswana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Botswana rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 212th and Botswana ranks 211th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Botswana: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/botswana/">Bhutan vs Botswana: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.