Botswana vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
211th
Eswatini rank
209th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.5 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.

Botswana ranks 211th and Eswatini ranks 209th of 216 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0022 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0069 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0039 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0062 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0055 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Botswana or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Botswana and Eswatini?
0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eswatini?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Eswatini rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 211th and Eswatini ranks 209th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/eswatini/">Botswana vs Eswatini: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.