Brazil vs Somalia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Brazil
0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
0.158 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
167th
Somalia rank
170th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Somalia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 0.0228 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 167th and Somalia ranks 170th of 216 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0472 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0398 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.0834 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0122 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0712 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.1053 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0258 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0795 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0833 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0439 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0394 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.1232 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0769 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.1463 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0638 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.1539 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1528 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Brazil or Somalia?
Brazil, at 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.158 metric tons per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Brazil and Somalia?
0.0228 metric tons per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Somalia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Somalia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 167th and Somalia ranks 170th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Somalia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/brazil/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/brazil/somalia-fed-rep/">Brazil vs Somalia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.