Burundi vs Tunisia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Burundi
0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.831 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
112th
Tunisia rank
109th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Tunisia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.831 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0.0399 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3247 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 0.537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2685 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 0.4644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5149 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0505 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.6581 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5601 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0981 metric tons per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 0.5253 metric tons per square kilometre 0.664 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1387 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.6774 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7856 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1082 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.7882 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8357 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0476 metric tons per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Burundi or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.831 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Burundi and Tunisia?
0.0399 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Tunisia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Tunisia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tunisia/">Burundi vs Tunisia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.