Cameroon vs Finland: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cameroon
0.511 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.4734 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
131st
Finland rank
134th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Finland
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.511 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4734 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0376 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Cameroon ranks 131st and Finland ranks 134th of 216 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1302 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1155 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.1405 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3603 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2198 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.1597 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5561 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3964 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.1837 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5767 metric tons per square kilometre 0.393 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.2876 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5246 metric tons per square kilometre 0.237 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.4866 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6145 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1279 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4924 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Finland?
Cameroon, at 0.511 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.4734 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Finland?
0.0376 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Finland rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 131st and Finland ranks 134th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Finland: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/finland/">Cameroon vs Finland: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.