Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Canada
0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.1 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
182nd
Saudi Arabia rank
180th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Saudi Arabia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 182nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 180th of 216 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1585 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0091 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1494 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.1518 metric tons per square kilometre 0.011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1408 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.1773 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0182 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1592 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.1525 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0234 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1291 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.1635 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0345 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1289 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.1253 metric tons per square kilometre 0.048 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0774 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0862 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0185 metric tons per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Canada or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Canada and Saudi Arabia?
0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Saudi Arabia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 182nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 180th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/canada/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/canada/saudi-arabia/">Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.