Colombia vs Guatemala: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Colombia
0.5671 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
126th
Guatemala rank
129th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Guatemala
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.5671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 126th and Guatemala ranks 129th of 216 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0534 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0219 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0315 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 0.0648 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0284 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 0.0846 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0321 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0524 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 0.5751 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1116 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4636 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 0.7476 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3073 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4402 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0.6626 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3897 metric tons per square kilometre 0.273 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 0.5775 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4842 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0933 metric tons per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Colombia or Guatemala?
Colombia, at 0.5671 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Colombia and Guatemala?
0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Guatemala rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 126th and Guatemala ranks 129th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Guatemala: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/colombia/guatemala/">Colombia vs Guatemala: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.