Comoros vs North Korea: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Comoros
7.46 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
7.42 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
31st
North Korea rank
33rd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Comoros
  • North Korea
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 7.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.42 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0.04 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

Comoros ranks 31st and North Korea ranks 33rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and North Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5197 metric tons per square kilometre 3.44 metric tons per square kilometre 2.92 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 2.26 metric tons per square kilometre 6.35 metric tons per square kilometre 4.09 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 4.91 metric tons per square kilometre 13.16 metric tons per square kilometre 8.25 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 6.67 metric tons per square kilometre 9.24 metric tons per square kilometre 2.56 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 8.58 metric tons per square kilometre 5.9 metric tons per square kilometre 2.68 metric tons per square kilometre Comoros
2010s 14.61 metric tons per square kilometre 6.58 metric tons per square kilometre 8.03 metric tons per square kilometre Comoros
2020s 9.73 metric tons per square kilometre 7.41 metric tons per square kilometre 2.32 metric tons per square kilometre Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Comoros or North Korea?
Comoros, at 7.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.42 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Comoros and North Korea?
0.04 metric tons per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and North Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Comoros and North Korea rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Comoros ranks 31st and North Korea ranks 33rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs North Korea: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/comoros/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/comoros/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Comoros vs North Korea: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.