Cote d'Ivoire vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.269 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
155th
Zambia rank
154th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1775 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0492 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1284 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 0.2153 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1469 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0.2732 metric tons per square kilometre 0.081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1922 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.2436 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1064 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1371 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.186 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1397 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0463 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.2644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0638 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0.2459 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2523 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Zambia?
0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Zambia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/zambia/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.