Cyprus vs Dominica: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cyprus
0.7494 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica
0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
114th
Dominica rank
116th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Dominica
051015196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.7494 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 0.0547 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.

Cyprus ranks 114th and Dominica ranks 116th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Dominica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Dominica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0968 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7407 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6439 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 0.1351 metric tons per square kilometre 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9695 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 0.2323 metric tons per square kilometre 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9394 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 1.58 metric tons per square kilometre 1.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3893 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 5.59 metric tons per square kilometre 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 4.41 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 0.7867 metric tons per square kilometre 1.04 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2526 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.9156 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3723 metric tons per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cyprus or Dominica?
Cyprus, at 0.7494 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cyprus and Dominica?
0.0547 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Dominica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Dominica rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 114th and Dominica ranks 116th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Dominica: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/dominica/">Cyprus vs Dominica: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.