Dominica vs Nicaragua: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Dominica
0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
116th
Nicaragua rank
119th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Nicaragua
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0253 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 6 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7407 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0524 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6883 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1970s 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0941 metric tons per square kilometre 1.01 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0399 metric tons per square kilometre 1.13 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 1.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1665 metric tons per square kilometre 1.02 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2999 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8797 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 1.04 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5736 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4658 metric tons per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 0.5434 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6748 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1314 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Dominica or Nicaragua?
Dominica, at 0.6947 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Dominica and Nicaragua?
0.0253 metric tons per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Nicaragua rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Nicaragua: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/dominica/nicaragua/">Dominica vs Nicaragua: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.