East Asia & Pacific vs Marshall Islands: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
6.03 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Marshall Islands
410.77 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
7th
Marshall Islands rank
5th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Marshall Islands
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 410.77 metric tons per square kilometre against 6.03 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 404.74 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 68.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th and Marshall Islands ranks 5th of 47 groups.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 2.5 metric tons per square kilometre 3.86 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2000s 3.58 metric tons per square kilometre 230.89 metric tons per square kilometre 227.31 metric tons per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2010s 5.09 metric tons per square kilometre 441.53 metric tons per square kilometre 436.44 metric tons per square kilometre Marshall Islands
2020s 5.82 metric tons per square kilometre 485.59 metric tons per square kilometre 479.77 metric tons per square kilometre Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 410.77 metric tons per square kilometre against 6.03 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Marshall Islands?
404.74 metric tons per square kilometre, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Marshall Islands?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Marshall Islands rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th and Marshall Islands ranks 5th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Marshall Islands: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/marshall-islands/">East Asia & Pacific vs Marshall Islands: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.