Ecuador vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Ecuador
7.78 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
High income
0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
28th
High income rank
26th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • High income
02468196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 7.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 7.02 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 10.2 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was High income ahead.

Ecuador ranks 28th and High income ranks 26th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and High income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador High income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1887 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7077 metric tons per square kilometre 0.519 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1970s 1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9474 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0543 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 2.66 metric tons per square kilometre 1.2 metric tons per square kilometre 1.46 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 1.9 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9636 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9391 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 2.37 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7961 metric tons per square kilometre 1.57 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 4.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7571 metric tons per square kilometre 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6.97 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7619 metric tons per square kilometre 6.21 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Ecuador or High income?
Ecuador, at 7.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.7644 metric tons per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Ecuador and High income?
7.02 metric tons per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and High income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and High income rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 28th and High income ranks 26th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/high-income/">Ecuador vs High income: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.