El Salvador vs Saint Lucia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
3.31 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Lucia
3.29 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
56th
Saint Lucia rank
57th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Saint Lucia
01234196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 3.31 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.29 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

El Salvador ranks 56th and Saint Lucia ranks 57th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4498 metric tons per square kilometre 1.37 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9163 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
1970s 0.4751 metric tons per square kilometre 2.97 metric tons per square kilometre 2.49 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
1980s 0.7137 metric tons per square kilometre 1.5 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7868 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
1990s 0.6047 metric tons per square kilometre 2.3 metric tons per square kilometre 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2000s 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre 3.04 metric tons per square kilometre 1.08 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 2.94 metric tons per square kilometre 3.31 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3734 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 3.4 metric tons per square kilometre 3.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3745 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Saint Lucia?
El Salvador, at 3.31 metric tons per square kilometre against 3.29 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Saint Lucia?
0.02 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Saint Lucia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Saint Lucia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 56th and Saint Lucia ranks 57th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Saint Lucia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/st-lucia/">El Salvador vs Saint Lucia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.