Guatemala vs East Timor: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.5149 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
129th
East Timor rank
130th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • East Timor
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5149 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.006 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 129th and East Timor ranks 130th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0219 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0219 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0321 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0321 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.1116 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0229 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0887 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.3073 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2456 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0617 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.3897 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3611 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0286 metric tons per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.4842 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5135 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0294 metric tons per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Guatemala or East Timor?
Guatemala, at 0.5209 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5149 metric tons per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Guatemala and East Timor?
0.006 metric tons per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and East Timor rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 129th and East Timor ranks 130th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs East Timor: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/timor-leste/">Guatemala vs East Timor: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.