Hungary vs Suriname: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Hungary
0.2453 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
160th
Suriname rank
163rd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Suriname
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.2453 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2744 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0424 metric tons per square kilometre 0.232 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.3365 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0564 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2801 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.425 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0315 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3935 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.224 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0902 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1338 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.2308 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1851 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0457 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.2449 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2356 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0093 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.2523 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0536 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Hungary or Suriname?
Hungary, at 0.2453 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1987 metric tons per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Hungary and Suriname?
0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Suriname rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Suriname: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hungary/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hungary/suriname/">Hungary vs Suriname: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.