Iceland vs Mauritius: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Iceland
14.85 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
19.11 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
18th
Mauritius rank
16th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 19.11 metric tons per square kilometre against 14.85 metric tons per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 4.26 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 8.97 metric tons per square kilometre 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 7.48 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 10.7 metric tons per square kilometre 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre 7.43 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 14.45 metric tons per square kilometre 5.9 metric tons per square kilometre 8.55 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 16.83 metric tons per square kilometre 7.78 metric tons per square kilometre 9.05 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 16.86 metric tons per square kilometre 4.78 metric tons per square kilometre 12.08 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 12.27 metric tons per square kilometre 8.89 metric tons per square kilometre 3.38 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 13.68 metric tons per square kilometre 16.9 metric tons per square kilometre 3.23 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Iceland or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 19.11 metric tons per square kilometre against 14.85 metric tons per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Iceland and Mauritius?
4.26 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritius: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritius/">Iceland vs Mauritius: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.