Iceland vs Philippines: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Iceland
14.85 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
13.76 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
18th
Philippines rank
19th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Philippines
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 14.85 metric tons per square kilometre against 13.76 metric tons per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 1.09 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 19th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 8.97 metric tons per square kilometre 2.42 metric tons per square kilometre 6.55 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 10.7 metric tons per square kilometre 4.6 metric tons per square kilometre 6.09 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 14.45 metric tons per square kilometre 6.93 metric tons per square kilometre 7.52 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 16.83 metric tons per square kilometre 9.22 metric tons per square kilometre 7.61 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 16.86 metric tons per square kilometre 13.58 metric tons per square kilometre 3.28 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 12.27 metric tons per square kilometre 15.09 metric tons per square kilometre 2.83 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 13.68 metric tons per square kilometre 13.88 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2012 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Iceland or Philippines?
Iceland, at 14.85 metric tons per square kilometre against 13.76 metric tons per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Iceland and Philippines?
1.09 metric tons per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Philippines rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 19th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Philippines: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/philippines/">Iceland vs Philippines: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.