Low income vs Myanmar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Low income
0.2818 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
4.33 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
47th
Myanmar rank
48th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Low income
  • Myanmar
012345196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 4.33 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2818 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 4.05 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 15.4 times Low income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 47th and Myanmar ranks 48th of 47 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0848 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5702 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4854 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
1970s 0.1415 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7398 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5983 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 0.2214 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9823 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7609 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 0.1878 metric tons per square kilometre 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre 1.06 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2000s 0.1901 metric tons per square kilometre 3.05 metric tons per square kilometre 2.86 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 0.2218 metric tons per square kilometre 4.55 metric tons per square kilometre 4.33 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 0.262 metric tons per square kilometre 4.35 metric tons per square kilometre 4.09 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Low income or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 4.33 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2818 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Low income and Myanmar?
4.05 metric tons per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low income and Myanmar rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Low income ranks 47th and Myanmar ranks 48th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Myanmar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-income/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-income/myanmar/">Low income vs Myanmar: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.