Macao vs Small states: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Macao
45.45 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Small states
4.13 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao rank
11th
Small states rank
8th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Macao
  • Small states
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 45.45 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.13 metric tons per square kilometre in Small states, a difference of 41.32 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 11.0 times Small states's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 11th and Small states ranks 8th of 216 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Small states Difference Ahead
1960s 327.22 metric tons per square kilometre 1.44 metric tons per square kilometre 325.79 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
1970s 337.88 metric tons per square kilometre 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre 336.09 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
1980s 312.42 metric tons per square kilometre 2.58 metric tons per square kilometre 309.83 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
1990s 94.41 metric tons per square kilometre 3.18 metric tons per square kilometre 91.24 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
2000s 55.7 metric tons per square kilometre 3.86 metric tons per square kilometre 51.84 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
2010s 48.83 metric tons per square kilometre 3.45 metric tons per square kilometre 45.38 metric tons per square kilometre Macao
2020s 45.49 metric tons per square kilometre 3.95 metric tons per square kilometre 41.54 metric tons per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Macao or Small states?
Macao, at 45.45 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.13 metric tons per square kilometre in Small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Macao and Small states?
41.32 metric tons per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Small states?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Macao and Small states rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Macao ranks 11th and Small states ranks 8th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Small states: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/small-states/">Macao vs Small states: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.