Malta vs Seychelles: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Malta
71.4 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
302.71 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
10th
Seychelles rank
7th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Seychelles
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 302.71 metric tons per square kilometre against 71.4 metric tons per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 231.31 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 4.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.

Malta ranks 10th and Seychelles ranks 7th of 216 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Seychelles Difference Ahead
1960s 4.17 metric tons per square kilometre 4.83 metric tons per square kilometre 0.658 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
1970s 4.34 metric tons per square kilometre 8.35 metric tons per square kilometre 4.01 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
1980s 3.78 metric tons per square kilometre 9.33 metric tons per square kilometre 5.55 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
1990s 10.35 metric tons per square kilometre 24.57 metric tons per square kilometre 14.22 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 14.7 metric tons per square kilometre 165 metric tons per square kilometre 150.31 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
2010s 41.4 metric tons per square kilometre 229.8 metric tons per square kilometre 188.4 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles
2020s 66.06 metric tons per square kilometre 307.48 metric tons per square kilometre 241.42 metric tons per square kilometre Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Malta or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 302.71 metric tons per square kilometre against 71.4 metric tons per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Malta and Seychelles?
231.31 metric tons per square kilometre, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Seychelles?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Seychelles rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 10th and Seychelles ranks 7th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Seychelles: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/malta/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/malta/seychelles/">Malta vs Seychelles: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.