Mauritania vs Mozambique: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.6145 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
121st
Mozambique rank
123rd

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Mozambique
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6145 metric tons per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.029 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 121st and Mozambique ranks 123rd of 216 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0198 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0075 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0325 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0478 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0163 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0267 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1108 metric tons per square kilometre 0.082 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3826 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1363 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5534 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1278 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Mozambique?
Mauritania, at 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6145 metric tons per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Mozambique?
0.029 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Mozambique rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 121st and Mozambique ranks 123rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Mozambique: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/mozambique/">Mauritania vs Mozambique: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.