Mauritania vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
121st
Tanzania rank
118th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 121st and Tanzania ranks 118th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0953 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.0382 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1861 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.0641 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3353 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2712 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3891 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3203 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 0.1928 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2095 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.5189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4423 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0767 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.6811 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0632 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Tanzania?
0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Tanzania rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 121st and Tanzania ranks 118th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/tanzania/">Mauritania vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.