New Caledonia vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.269 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
153rd
Zambia rank
154th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0492 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0747 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0063 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.2022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1212 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.2436 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1064 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1371 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.3098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1397 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1701 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.2975 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0969 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.271 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2523 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Zambia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Zambia?
0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zambia rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 153rd and Zambia ranks 154th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zambia/">New Caledonia vs Zambia: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.