Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Nicaragua
0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
119th
Tanzania rank
118th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0119 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 119th and Tanzania ranks 118th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0524 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0702 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.0941 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1302 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.0399 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3353 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2955 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.1665 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3891 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2226 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 0.2999 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1024 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.5736 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4423 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1314 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.6748 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0569 metric tons per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6694 metric tons per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Tanzania?
0.0119 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Tanzania rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 119th and Tanzania ranks 118th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/">Nicaragua vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.