Poland vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Poland
0.6937 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland rank
117th
Palestine rank
120th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Poland
  • Palestine
0123196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.6937 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.0479 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 117th and Palestine ranks 120th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 6 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9587 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9587 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1970s 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1980s 2.14 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 2.14 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1990s 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2456 metric tons per square kilometre 1.08 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2000s 0.7068 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3798 metric tons per square kilometre 0.327 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2010s 0.7742 metric tons per square kilometre 0.505 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2693 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2020s 0.7415 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8105 metric tons per square kilometre 0.069 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Poland or Palestine?
Poland, at 0.6937 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Poland and Palestine?
0.0479 metric tons per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Poland and Palestine rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Poland ranks 117th and Palestine ranks 120th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/poland/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/poland/west-bank-and-gaza/">Poland vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.