Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Puerto Rico
0.2435 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2435 metric tons per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3107 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3061 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.282 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2706 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0.218 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0546 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1634 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.3414 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1577 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1838 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.4162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.226 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1902 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0.1899 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1785 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.2115 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0781 metric tons per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2435 metric tons per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
0.0128 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Puerto Rico ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.