Tanzania vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Tanzania
0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
118th
Palestine rank
120th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania
  • Palestine
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.0355 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 118th and Palestine ranks 120th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 5 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Palestine Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1227 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2243 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.3353 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3353 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.3891 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2456 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1435 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 0.4022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3798 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.4423 metric tons per square kilometre 0.505 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine
2020s 0.6179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8105 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1925 metric tons per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Tanzania or Palestine?
Tanzania, at 0.6813 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6458 metric tons per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Tanzania and Palestine?
0.0355 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Palestine?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Palestine rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Tanzania ranks 118th and Palestine ranks 120th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/west-bank-and-gaza/">Tanzania vs Palestine: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.