Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tanzania
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
38th
Tanzania rank
38th

Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Tanzania
0000196019922024

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 7.1 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 38th of 47 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0.0001 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
37 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania rank globally for total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Tanzania ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total fisheries production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Total fisheries production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.