Kiribati vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square

Kiribati
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
143rd
Norway rank
140th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square over time

  • Kiribati
  • Norway
000197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 143rd and Norway ranks 140th of 203 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per square, Kiribati or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per square between Kiribati and Norway?
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Norway rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per square?
Kiribati ranks 143rd and Norway ranks 140th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/">Kiribati vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.