Bangladesh vs United Arab Emirates: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Bangladesh
220.83 Mt CO2e
in 2024
United Arab Emirates
264.15 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
35th
United Arab Emirates rank
32nd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Bangladesh
  • United Arab Emirates
50100150200250197019972024

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 264.15 Mt CO2e against 220.83 Mt CO2e in Bangladesh, a difference of 43.32 Mt CO2e.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 35th and United Arab Emirates ranks 32nd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 54.47 Mt CO2e 51.81 Mt CO2e 2.66 Mt CO2e Bangladesh
1980s 63.66 Mt CO2e 62.18 Mt CO2e 1.49 Mt CO2e Bangladesh
1990s 85.21 Mt CO2e 99.84 Mt CO2e 14.62 Mt CO2e United Arab Emirates
2000s 119.5 Mt CO2e 155.63 Mt CO2e 36.13 Mt CO2e United Arab Emirates
2010s 175.59 Mt CO2e 239.58 Mt CO2e 63.99 Mt CO2e United Arab Emirates
2020s 216.35 Mt CO2e 255.83 Mt CO2e 39.48 Mt CO2e United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Bangladesh or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 264.15 Mt CO2e against 220.83 Mt CO2e in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates?
43.32 Mt CO2e, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and United Arab Emirates rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Bangladesh ranks 35th and United Arab Emirates ranks 32nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs United Arab Emirates: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/bangladesh/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/bangladesh/united-arab-emirates/">Bangladesh vs United Arab Emirates: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).