Bolivia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Bolivia
63.76 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo
58.49 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Bolivia rank
68th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
71st

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Bolivia
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0204060197019972024

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 63.76 Mt CO2e against 58.49 Mt CO2e in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 5.27 Mt CO2e.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 68th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 71st of 203 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 31.68 Mt CO2e 12.44 Mt CO2e 19.24 Mt CO2e Bolivia
1980s 28.62 Mt CO2e 22.8 Mt CO2e 5.82 Mt CO2e Bolivia
1990s 32.01 Mt CO2e 24.21 Mt CO2e 7.8 Mt CO2e Bolivia
2000s 32.91 Mt CO2e 25.78 Mt CO2e 7.14 Mt CO2e Bolivia
2010s 47.58 Mt CO2e 39.63 Mt CO2e 7.95 Mt CO2e Bolivia
2020s 55.81 Mt CO2e 54.83 Mt CO2e 0.9776 Mt CO2e Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Bolivia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Bolivia, at 63.76 Mt CO2e against 58.49 Mt CO2e in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Bolivia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
5.27 Mt CO2e, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bolivia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Bolivia ranks 68th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 71st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/bolivia/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/bolivia/congo-dem-rep/">Bolivia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).