Botswana vs Central African Republic: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Botswana
12.1 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Central African Republic
13.44 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Botswana rank
134th
Central African Republic rank
133rd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Botswana
  • Central African Republic
2.557.51012.515197019972024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 13.44 Mt CO2e against 12.1 Mt CO2e in Botswana, a difference of 1.34 Mt CO2e.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 134th and Central African Republic ranks 133rd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Central African Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 5.23 Mt CO2e 2.04 Mt CO2e 3.19 Mt CO2e Botswana
1980s 7.17 Mt CO2e 6.04 Mt CO2e 1.13 Mt CO2e Botswana
1990s 8.96 Mt CO2e 8.26 Mt CO2e 0.7007 Mt CO2e Botswana
2000s 10.17 Mt CO2e 9.76 Mt CO2e 0.4013 Mt CO2e Botswana
2010s 12.11 Mt CO2e 11.87 Mt CO2e 0.2409 Mt CO2e Botswana
2020s 12.09 Mt CO2e 12.93 Mt CO2e 0.8429 Mt CO2e Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Botswana or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 13.44 Mt CO2e against 12.1 Mt CO2e in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Botswana and Central African Republic?
1.34 Mt CO2e, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Central African Republic?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Central African Republic rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Botswana ranks 134th and Central African Republic ranks 133rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Central African Republic: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/botswana/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/botswana/central-african-republic/">Botswana vs Central African Republic: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).